Talmud su I Cronache 29:21

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish was passing by the school when he heard them reciting the verse¹³⁹1Chr. 29:21., they sacrificed animal sacrifices and brought elevation sacrifices the next day. He said, he who interrupts follows the House of Shammai; he who reads it as one sentence follows the House of Hillel. One understands elevation sacrifices the next day; but well-being sacrifices the next day? Are not well-being sacrifices brought following the House of Shammai? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, David died on Pentecost; all of Israel were deep mourners and they brought the next day.

Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish was passing by the school when he heard them reciting the verse⁶⁵1Chr. 29:21., they sacrificed animal sacrifices and brought elevation sacrifices the next day. He said, he who interrupts follows the House of Shammai⁶⁶If one reads they sacrificed animal sacrifices, but they brought elevation sacrifices the next day, one implies that the day when Solomon was definitively installed as King in an assembly of all of Israel was a holiday, a natural assumption. While זֶבַח simply means “slaughtered offering”, in the Talmudim the expression always is interpreted to refer to family sacrifices, well-being or thanksgiving offerings. The verse then implies that it was permitted to bring well-being sacrifices on the same day, but not elevation offerings, which seems to follow the House of Shammai. (Since the House of Shammai require that the leaning-on ceremony be performed the day before, this interpretation presupposes that everybody knew in advance what David was going to do; unlikely but not impossible.); he who reads it as one sentence follows the House of Hillel⁶⁷If one reads the verse following the masoretic accents it is one unit and implies that well-being and elevation offerings were brought on the same day, but since the next day was supposed to be a workday, what one should formulate that the verse describe a situation equally acceptable to both Houses.. One understands elevation sacrifices the next day; but well-being sacrifices the next day? Are not well-being sacrifices brought following the House of Shammai⁶⁸This is an objection to the first statement, that the verse may be read supporting the House of Shammai. As usual, the argument refers to the part of the verse not quoted. In the second part of the verse it first is stated that the official offerings were 1’000 bulls, 1’000 rams, 1’000 sheep and their libation, in addition to animal sacrifices (i. e., well-being sacrifices) of all of Israel. This implies that all elevation sacrifices were State sacrifices; following the House of Shammai the well-being sacrifices of all of Israel would have to be mentioned before, not after, the elevation sacrifices.? Rebbi Yose ben Rebbi Abun said, David died on Pentecost⁶⁹Since the obituary notice for David is immediately following (vv. 26–28), it is implied that he died immediately after handing over to Salomon the blueprint for the Temple and the money to cover the expenses.; all of Israel were deep mourners⁷⁰People who are obligated to take care of the burial of any Jew are barred from sacral acts. It is difficult but not totally impossible to combine R. Yose ben R. Abun’s statement with v. 22, that on that day they ate and drank in great joy. and they brought the next day.